The social perspectives revealed in
the text shed a light on the corruption of the society in Pakistan. Taliban is in
control and is destroying gender equality and gender justice. Also, Carol shows
that even though Malala and some people are actually trying to improve the
situation of women, there are just a few men who are encouraged to do so. Then,
this text shows the aspect of the society now in Pakistan and stresses a very
important social problem which is gender justice.
As for the emotional perspective, the
writer is clearly mad about the fact that Malala is being exploited by a lot in
the west while others and women especially are actually being suppressed. Carol’s
tone seems to be annoyed and mad throughout the text, it’s clearly shown
through her ironic sentences that are found in many parts of the text, where
she makes a joke related to her argument in order to show to what extent she’s
angry.
The text is argumentative. The
rhetorical mode is impersonal since the writer is addressing problem which is Malala and her being exploited,
along with gender justice. Concerning the analyzing style, Carol uses a lot of
quotation marks in the text where she wanted the words to seem ironic. Her sentences
are neither too long nor too short for she wants the readers to fully gasp her
point of view and her argument. On the other hand, there are several times when
Carol’s intentions were ambiguous (when she put a word inside quotations which
makes us wonder what she really means). This actually created depth for the
text and made us think about the problem she is posing, and her position
regarding this problem.
As for the logical perspective, Carol
clearly states that she is not against Malala as a person, but she believes
that she’s being exploited while many others are being suppressed. She presents
a lot of evidence to strengthen her point like real life events and the
opinions of experts in the field of gender justice. She uses the deductive
method where she stated her argument at the beginning of the text which is that
Malala is being exploited, and then she defended her stand with evidence and
explained it.
Finally, concerning the ethical
perspective. Carol’s text is clearly concerned with gender justice and other
social problems. Carole believes that all people especially women who are
fighting for justice should be heard and not just Malala because she was shot by
Taliban. Carol wants justice; she is interested in the welfare of the community. Also, she is against what Malala's mentors are doing, they're using her and her circumstances just to get profit and advertisement, which she views as wrong.


social: dont say Carol say Grayson, also this is good needs some justification, but you hint at half the argument grayson mentions. there is the perspective of women's rights in the UK
ReplyDeleteemotional: give examples, quote, cite, and she isnt ironic she is sarcastic
rhetorical: GREAT Justification
logical: Again missing the UK gender angle, So Important
ethical: ok