Thursday, September 24, 2015
Response Prep,by Walaa Ibreek
Walaa Ibreek
Professor Dania Adra
Eng 203
In the social perspective, Carol Grayson highlights the issues of girl's education and gender justice that many other Eastern countries are facing. She shows that Taliban has banned girl's education and erased gender justice in Pakistan. Carol also shows the extent to which women are exploited by some men whether emotionally, physically, or financially and their rejection to improve the situation of women in the society claiming that the domination is for men while women's job is to obey their demands and orders.
As for the emotional perspective, Grayson supports Malala for her wish of education for all and achieving justice between both sexes. However, the writer's tone is based on suspicion, disappointment, and anger. The writer doubts the real issues that was hidden under the guise of exploitation. Malala was the only girl between many who bypass a lot of obstacles faced by others for the best possible health care in the UK. Inaddition, Carol shed a light on other girls who are still suppressed without care and help in Pakistan.
Concerning the argumentation in the text, the writer uses an impersonal writing style. She doesn't show her emotions and her personality in the text. she insists on narrating Malala's story in a clear and an unambiguous way. Moreover, she uses long sentences,many quotation, and specific repetition to deliver her message clearly and make it more understandable to the reader. Her aim was to persuade others that Malala "the brave schoolgirl" was being abused as a marketable brand in the west.
As for the logical perspective of the text, the writer uses the deductive method in her text. She believes that Malala is the brave girl who gives voice to her dreams of education and stand against "Taliban" who banned girls from going to schools. She also mentioned in the first part of the text that Malala was being exploited by her new mentor in the UK. Thus, she starts supporting her thesis by giving justification, examples, and arguments. Moreover, she shows that injustice was ingrained in Malala's society, but no one was really supporting her because they were treated her as a brand for getting profits.
Finally, in the ethical perspective, Grayson emphasizes that it's wrong to consider Malala as a brand and to exploit her for gaining money. Furthermore, she was against gender discrimination and prohibiting girls from their right of education. She believes that women have the right to give voices to their dreams, to spoke out about their passions, and to fight for gender equality.
Labels:
Response Prep
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
social: so your on the right track, but the text criticizes attitudes of the west about Malala and then talks about gender issues at home.
ReplyDeleteemotional: dont say carol but grayson. Good job, i would argue that your supposed too make your justification more clear: This results in ... outcome.
Rhetorical: great see the justification here: HER GOAL..
Logical: you miss the point of the text, but you come close.
Ethical: great