Ghiwa Harakeh Salman Harakeh
Response Preperation
Professor: Dania Adra
Socially, Carol Grayson indicates the real situation
of education in general and especially girls education and the situation of
gender justice in our eastern countries. She illustrates that the erasing of
gender justice in Pakistan. She shows also the exploitation of many women by
many men and the deleting of te women’s rights at the same time. In this text
she claims the rejection of men and their attitude to women emotionally,
physically, and financially.
As for the emotional perspective, Grayson shows her
anger and disappointment and suspicion. She supports the Malala for her point
of view about the improvement of the educational situation for girls.in
addition, she highlights on the bad situation of girls in Pakistan.
During writing this text, the writer was objective which
means that she was trying to deliver her message without claiming clearly her
point of view. She used to include long sentences many quotes and examples to
let the reader understand more clearly and figures the real illustration of the
Malala’s Girl.
Concerning the logical perspective, Grayson used the
deductive method. She believes that the Malala’s Girl is a girl who fights for
her dreams and her right of education against Taliban who banned girls from
going to school and continuing their education. Thus, she starts supporting her thesis by giving
justification, examples, and arguments. Moreover, she shows that injustice was
ingrained in Malala's society, but no one was really supporting her because
they were treated her as a brand for getting profits.
Finally,
in the ethical perspective, Grayson’s was against considering the Malala’s as a
brand for gaining money, she claims clearly that she was also against the
discrimination of educational issue of girls and believes that every women has
her rights that should be gotten.
Socially: You talk so generally, be more specific. Grammar is weak!
ReplyDeleteEmotionally: you do not justify and your analysis is weak.
Rhetorical: Good, but I feel like examples would help, again justification is weak, also you seem to have misunderstood the text.
Logical: GOOD
Ethical: good more justification.