Response prep:"Brand Malala"

The article sheds an eye for a social problem that the voices of many aren’t heard while ones voice is heard. For example, “why is it that some cases are projected into the media whilst thousands of other cases are suppressed by government including by one of the same politicians so supportive to malala.”(paragraph 18) Which shows that the propaganda is only concerned about making the government look good while many other issues are left untouched.

Then there is the emotional perspective, where it is shown through the text that Carol the author is happy for Malala, yet she is frustrated with the fact that many problems are left unresolved leaving women’s rights unjustified. Her tone in the text is shown to be frustrated which is shown in one of the texts: “Exploitation of women whether emotionally, physically, financially is so ingrained in our society and institutions that I'm not even sure whether some men realize their actions.” this indicates how she is mad about the fact that women are still being abused even though some situations where resolved.

As for the rhetorical perspective it is clear that the text is an explanatory text that is written formally, which is shown by formal language and organization of thoughts. Carol had used the irony by asking about the number of people who might recognize the names of the other girls who where injured. Which clearly states the idea of people only focusing on one thing making them forget the other issues around them.

The logical perspective in the text is shown by her proving her statements where she said that Malala shouldn’t make the people close their eyes on other issues that women are fighting for, because it won’t support her cause and is leading women a step backwards to winning their rights back. Which proves the point that no case is more important than the other.

In the ethical perspective, the UK is treating people unfairly where they aren’t getting full access to health care and are ending up being held in detention centers, while one girl was provided with the best medical care and was given attention, although they have the power to send many into hospitals to be taken care of. So Carol had shed light on the fact that no person is more deserving than the other, therefor it is unjust for others not to get the same attention.