Thursday, September 24, 2015

Blog 2: Response Prep

In this text Grayson highlights the influence that media and governments have over social facts presented to the public.  In fact they twist stories, misleading the public and taking advantage of a schoolgirl’s experience (Malala).  This sociological perspective adopted by Grayson shocks the reader.

Concerning the emotional perspective, the author is disappointed and annoyed by the image granted to Malala. She disapproves with the vast attention that Malala is receiving (compared to other injured women around the world) especially from Gordon Brown who holds positions against women: “He is known as a misogynist by his former work colleagues” (P05.L05-06). Grayson is disgusted by this attention that is tending to cover more important issues.

Regarding the rhetorical perspective, this text is argumentative written in an impersonal way. Grayson is mostly objective and is trying to deal the issue professionally. She uses a lot of comparison to portray the situation: “…YET one young lady is flown in to the UK and provided with the best possible care”(P07.L06-07). In addition, she denotes the similarity of the situation between Roberta Menchu and Malala who were both lead to what they represent now. Grayson employs a rapid rhythm:” There is Malala the book, Malala the film, Malala the award nominee, Malala the portrait” in order to emphasis the marketing of “Malala the brand”.

As for the logical perspective, Grayson is debating whether the image of Malala is helping the cause of women or it is a wall hiding certain realities (like the inefficiency of the political power ). The author used an inductive reasoning; in fact she started by Malala’s story to conclude about gender inequality (present not only in Pakistan but also the UK) and wrongdoings of governments.


Finally, the ethical perspective is illustrated by the position of Grayson who thinks that what is happening is wrong. She recalls about the responsibility of society specially men in this situation. The controversy lying around Malala demeans her credibility. This perspective is used to show the values and point out the issues around this subject (social injustice and favoritism).

1 comment:

  1. Social: You use very vague language. Try adding an example.
    Emotional: (Grayson Page number). Yours is wrong. Plus there is so much to say, your analysis is a little weak. Justify better.
    Rhetorical: good analysis, no justification.
    Good ethical perspective.
    Logical: again why do the conclusion you draw about the text matter? This is justification.

    ReplyDelete